In the
article, Fort Hood Suspect’s Beard must be Shaved, Military Judge Rules,
Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was being put on trial for the shooting that he was
convicted of in 2009. Just recently he is being trialed for growing his beard.
Major Hasan said he was growing it out of devotion to his Muslim faith but it
has caused an issue especially since he is being trialed in a military court. Army
regulations don’t permit soldiers to have beards and those who violate that
regulation allow for army officials to forcibly shave their beard. Hasan has been fined multiple times for
showing up in court with a beard and has been forced to watch the trial from a
near-by trailer. In the matter of the shooting he is being trialed for killing
13 and wounding 32 in November of 2009. If he is convicted, he is to receive
the death penalty. On Thursday Hasan was allowed to sit in the courtroom for an
entire hearing for the first time since June. This hearing was held to
determine if shaving him would violate his religious rights under the Religious
Freedom Restoration Act, a law that was made in 1993 to protect religious
observance from government interference. Hasan’s defense lawyers said that he
grew it out of sincere belief in his religion and his calm attitude during the
hearing showed that it wasn’t a disruption as Colonel Gross had said it was
earlier. His lead military lawyer Lt. Col. Kris R. Poppe said that if his beard
was forcibly shaved then it would put him a perilous state. Army prosecutors
believe that shaving his beard wouldn’t be violating his rights. They believe
he grew it out so that witnesses wouldn’t be able to identify him in court. As
evidence they submitted a transcript of a recorded phone call Hasan had while
he was in the Bell County Jail in nearby Belton, TX. A prosecutor states that
during the phone call Hasan pledged allegiance to the mujahedeen. Col. Poppe
claimed that his past remarks did not matter because it was only recently this
year that he began his intensified religious reflection. He also stated that
Hasan offered twice to plead guilty of all charges and for him to try to
disguise himself doesn’t go with him trying to plead guilty. Col. Gross ruled
that forcibly shaving his hair doesn’t violate his rights because the law
states that as long as it shows a “compelling” need to do so and if it uses the
“least restrictive means” available, it was ok. Col. Gross said that a forced
shaving met those requirements. The judge’s orders won’t be enforced until
Major Hasan’s appeal has been exhausted. Everything has been put on hold. His
trial was supposed to start August 20 but due to the beard issue it has been
put on hold.
There really isn’t a way to analyze this
situation. Although Hasan committed a crime he fully committed himself to his
culture and their ways. Since he was being trialed in a military courtroom the
fact that he had grown his beard out was against normal military regulations.
If he were to be trialed in a normal courtroom there wouldn’t have been a
problem. I wouldn’t consider this a social problem because there is nothing
that society could do as a collective to solve this problem. If they could, it’s
a possibility that it could be a social problem because it could affect the
Muslim culture. There is also a possibility that it could be considered a
public issue because it affects more than just Hasan and his family. It also
affects everyone in the courtroom and man people in the Muslim culture. If they
decided to allow him to keep his beard are the doing the right thing? If they
didn’t are they taking his religious rights away? That could create a value
conflict because they are considering their values; what is right and wrong. The prosecutor believes they should shave
Hasan’s beard because that’s regulation and he was possibly trying to disguise
himself from witnesses. Hasan’s defense lawyers believe shaving his beard is
taking away his religious rights. It’s a disagreement on values.
No comments:
Post a Comment