The charity Oxfam has cast doubt on an international method
that aims to enhance the provision of the most successful treatment for
malaria. Oxfam says there
is no evidence the program has saved the lives of the most unprotected people. The
body behind the AMFm says a self-governing study shows it has improved access
and reduced drug prices. The scheme was
introduced three years ago by the Global Fund to Fight Aids, TB and Malaria. It
acts as a global subsidy to provide greater access to combination therapy for
malaria, particularly through private-sector drug retailers in rising
countries. The idea is to diminish the use of older treatments that carry a
higher risk of confrontation, and to untap the potential of the private sector
in reaching remote communities. More than 200 million people contract malaria
every year and 655,000 die from the disease - most of them are young kids. The method
is being piloted in seven countries including Kenya, Ghana and Nigeria. Its
future will be measured at a meeting of the Global Fund's board next month. Oxfam
has criticized it as "risky and dangerous". The charity's senior
health policy advisor, Dr Mohga Kamal Yanni, said: "It is dangerous to put
the lives of sick children in the hands of a shopkeeper with no medical
training, and to pursue a scheme that doesn't help those people who need it the
most.”
Malaria
is rapidly becoming a problem throughout the entire world. And the fact that
there is a method occurring that the tests may be a “scam” is outrageous. This could
affect the entire world population. It makes me wonder if this is a type of
genocide, and that people want rid of others for some reason not known to me. But
that is just my opinion. We discussed in class the other day that the world is
being overpopulated and that there are more retired than there are working. This
could oppose a problem if in fact the scheme is true. If the people in the work
force are dying, then who will be able to support the retired citizens? It makes
me think about what this world is coming to, and whether or not we should trust
this occurrence.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-20046199
No comments:
Post a Comment